Which of the following is NOT a component of tracking history?

• A. Visual Observation
• B. Audio Confirmation
• C. Written Documentation
• D. Unit Confirmation

Answer: (C)

Written documentation is not considered a direct component of tracking history in the context of speed measurement devices. Tracking history typically involves methods that provide real-time or immediate evidence of speed enforcement. Visual observation refers to the officer's direct observation of the vehicle and its speed, while audio confirmation can include sounds from certain enforcement devices that indicate speed measurements or alerts. Unit confirmation generally affirms that the measurement device is functioning and recording speeds accurately.

While written documentation is important for record-keeping and legal reasons, it serves a different purpose in the overall process of speed enforcement. Therefore, it does not fit into the core components that are actively involved in tracking and confirming the speed of vehicles in the moment.